FRAMING EFFECT ON DELAY DISCOUNTING IN YOUNG ADULTS REPORTING ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION: ANALYSIS OF REWARD DOMAIN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21134/haaj.v22i1.616Keywords:
Delay Discounting, Framing Effect, Hidden-Zero Effect, Domain, HealthAbstract
Preference for delayed rewards has been promoted by making explicit that preference for one alternative implies not receiving the not chosen alternative, a result named the hidden-zero effect. Objective. The present research assessed the generality of the hidden-zero effect in delay discounting tasks in two domains (i.e., monetary and healÂth) in participants that reported alcohol consumption. Method. The participants were exposed to two discounting tasks, one with the implicit zero and one with the explicit zero, using both health and monetary rewards and emploÂying different amounts. Results. Results showed a tendency to reduce the value of future monetary consequences at higher rate as a function of alcohol drinking. Also, the hidden-zero effect and the magnitude effect were repliÂcated in the monetary domain independently of alcohol drinking status. Nevertheless, none of these effects were observed using health outcomes with the actual procedure. Finally, no systematic association between discounting rate and negative consequences derived from alcohol consumption was observed. Conclusions. Making explicit the opportunity cost reduce discounting rate of monetary outcomes, but more research is needed to clarify the absence of effects when deciding about health.
Downloads
References
Adams, S., Attwood, A. S., & Munafò, M. R. (2017). Drinking status but not acute alcohol consumption influences delay discounting. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 32(5), 1-7. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170045
Aisline, G. (1975). Specious Reward: A Behaviolar Theory of Impulsiveness and Impulse Control. Psychological Bulletin, 82(4), 463-406.
Amlung, M., Vedelago, L., Acker, J., Balodis, I., & MacKillop, J. (2017). Steep delay discounting and addictive behavior: A metaâ€analysis of continuous associations. Addiction, 112(1), 51-62. doi: 10.1111/add.13535
Bailey, A., Gerst, K., & Fin, P. (2018). Delay discounting of losses and rewards in alcohol Use Disorder: The Effect of Working Memory Load. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 32(2), 197-204. doi: 10.1111/acer.13472
Bickel, W. K., Odum, A. L., & Madden, G. J. (1999). Impulsivity, and cigarette smoking: delay discounting un current, never, and ex-smokers. Psichopharmacology, (146), 337-454. doi: 10.1007/PL00005490
Chapman, G. B. (1996). Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(3), 771. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.771
De Wit, H., y Richards, J. B. (2004). Dual Determinants of Drug Use in Humans: Reward and Impulsivity. In R. A. Bevins & M. T. Bardo (Eds.), Vol. 50 of the Nebraska symposium on motivation. Motivational factors in the etiology of drug abuse. Vol. 50 of the Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 19-55). Lincoln, NE, US: University of Nebraska Press.
Dennhardt, A. A., & Murphy, J. G. (2011). Associations Between Depression, Distress Tolerance, Delay Discounting, and Alcohol-Related Problems in European American and African American College Students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25(4), 595-604. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025807
Field, M., Christiansen, P., Cole, J., & Goudie, A. (2007). Delay discounting and the alcohol Stroop in heavy drinking adolescents. Addiction, 102(4), 579-586. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01743.x
Gerst, K. R., Gunn, R. L., & Finn, P. R. (2017). Delay discounting of losses in alcohol use disorders and antisocial psychopathology: Effects of a working memory load. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 41(10), 1768-1774. doi: 10.1111/acer.13472
Gowin, J., Sloan, M. E., Swan, J. E., Momenan, R., & Ramchandani, V. A. (2019). The relationship between delay discounting and alcohol dependence in individuals with and without comorbid psychopathology. Psychopharmacology, 236(2), 775-785. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-5113-3
Holt, D. D., Green, L., & Myerson, J., (2012). Estimating the subjetive value of future rewards: Comparison of adjusting-amount and adjusting-delay procedures. Behavioural Processesk, 90, 302-310. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.03.003
Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2008). An algorithm for identifying nonsystematic delay-discounting data. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 16(3), 264. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.16.3.264
Johnson, M. W., Bickel, W. K., & Backer, F. (2007). Moderate drug use and delay discounting: A comparison of heavy, light, and never smokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 15(2), 187-194. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.15.2.187
Johnson, P. S., Herrmann, E. S., & Johnson, M. W. (2014). Opportunity costs of reward delays and the discounting of hypothetical money and cigarettes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 103(1), 87-107. doi: 10.1002/jeab.110
Koffarnus, M. N., y Bickel, W. K. (2014). A 5-trial adjusting delay discounting task: Accurate discount rates in less than one minute. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 22(3), 222. doi: 10.1037/a0035973
Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(1), 78-87. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445.128.1.78
Magen, E., Dweck, C. y James, G. (2008). The Hidden-Zero Effect. Representing a single choice as an extended sequence reduces Impulsive Choice. Asociation for Psychological Sciencie, 19(7), 648-649. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02137.x
Mayhew, M. J., Byrne, J. M., Powell, J. H., & Meynen, T. (2020). Are hazardous drinkers more impulsive than light drinkers? A comprehensive assessment in young adults. Alcohol, 84, 9-20. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2019.09.007
Myerson, J., Baumann, A. A., & Green, L. (2017). Individual differences in delay discounting: differences are quantitative with gains, but qualitative with losses. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(2), 359-372. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1947
Myerson, J., Green, L., Van Den Berk-Clark, C., & Grucza, R. A. (2015). Male, but not female, alcohol-dependent African Americans discount delayed gains more steeply than propensity-score matched controls. Psychopharmacology, 232(24), 4493-4503. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-4076-x
Naudé, G. P., Kaplan, B. A., Reed, D. D., Henley, A. J., y DiGennaro Reed, F. D. (2018). Temporal framing and the hiddenâ€zero effect: rateâ€dependent outcomes on delay discounting. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 109(3), 506-519. doi: 10.1002/jeab.328
Nomicos, L., Jacobs, K.W. & Locey, M.L. (2020). The Effects of Obligatory and Preferential Frames on Delay Discounting. Analysis Verbal Behav. doi: 10.1007/s40616-020-00127-0
Petry, N. M. (2003). Discounting of money, healt, and freedom in substance abusers and controls. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, (71), 645-655. doi: 10.1016/S0376-8716(03)00090-5
Petry, N. M. (2001). Delay discounting of money and alcohol in actively using alcoholics, currently abstinent alcoholics, and controls. Psychopharmacology, 154(3), 243-250. doi: 10.1007/s002130000638
Rachlin, H. (1995). Self-control: Beyond commitment. Behavioral and brain sciences, 18(11), 109-121. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00037602
Radu, P. T., Yi, R., Bickel, W. K., Gross, J. J., y McClure, S. M. (2011). A mechanism for reducing delay discounting by altering temporal attention. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 96(3), 363-385. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-363
Sawicki, P., Markiewicz, Å., & BiaÅ‚ek, M. (2020). Magnitude effect contributes to the domain specificity in delay discounting. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 33(3), 323-332. doi: 10.1002/bdm.2159
Salazar, M. L., Vacio, M. A., López, M. A., y Sánchez, F. M. (2012). Adaptación del Young Adult Alcohol Problem Screening Test (YAAPST) con estudiantes universitarios de México. Investigación y ciencia, 20(56), 44-52.
Scholten, H., Scheres, A., de Water, E., Graf, U., Granic, I., & Luijten, M. (2019). Behavioral trainings and manipulations to reduce delay discounting: A systematic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(6), 1803-1849. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01629-2
Secretaria de Salud, Consejo Nacional contra las Adicciones, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (2016). Encuesta Nacional de Adicciones. Cuestionario Individual. Instrumento no publicado. Recuperado de https://encuestas.insp.mx/ena/encodat2017/cuestionario_encodat_individual_2016_2017.pdf
Smith, K. R, Lawyer, S. R., & Swift, J. K. (2018) A Meta-Analysis of nonsystematic responding in delay and probability reward discounting. Experimental and clinical Psychopharmacology, 26(1), 94-107. doi: 10.1037/pha0000167
Stam, C. H., van der Veen, F. M., & Franken, I. H. (2020). Individual differences in time estimation are associated with delay discounting and alcohol use. Current Psychology, 1-10. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01629-2
Stanger, C., Ryan, S. R., Fu, H., Landes, R. D., Jones, B. A., Bickel, W. K., & Budney, A. J. (2012). Delay discounting predicts adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome. Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 20(3), 205. doi: 10.1037/a0026543
Takahashi, T., Ohmura, Y. & Radford, M. (2009) Alcohol use and discounting of delayed and probabilistic gain and loss. Neuroendorinology letters, 30(6), 749-752. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Taiki_Takahashi/publication/269099907_O_R_I_G_I_N_A_L_A_R_T_I_C_L_E_Alcohol_use_and_discounting_of_delayed_and_probabilistic_gain_and_loss/links/54803da00cf2ccc7f8bb3be7.pdf
World Health Organization (2018). Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization. Recuperado de https://www.who.int/substance_abuse/publications/global_alcohol_report/gsr_2018/en/
Wu, C. Y., y He, G. B. (2012). The effects of time perspective and salience of possible monetary losses on intertemporal choice. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 40(10), 1645-1653. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2012.40.10.1645
Vuchinich, R. E., & Simpson, C. A. (1998). Hyperbolic temporal discounting in social drinkers and problem drinkers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 6(3), 292–305. doi: 10.1037//1064-1297.6.3.292
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Health and Addictions Journal/Revista Salud y Drogas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal agree to the journal's statement of ethical principles and to the following terms:
The rights of the published material shall belong to their respective authors. Articles published in HAAJ may be used under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license, and may be read, copied, distributed, printed, searched, or linked to in the full text of this journal without prior permission from the publisher or author, provided that HAAJ and the authors are acknowledged and not used for commercial purposes.
Authors may include the work in institutional repositories or other publications as long as this journal is acknowledged and properly cited.
The HAAJ editorial team encourages authors to disseminate their published work through any means (conferences, classes, lectures, talks, etc.) and/or platforms (social networks, repositories, websites, etc.).
HAAJ follows the Core Practices of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics).
How to Cite
