Self-medication with recreational use: analysis of discussions in forums of a virtual community.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21134/haaj.v22i2.717Keywords:
self-medication, psicoactive substances, qualitative research, netnography, online communitiesAbstract
The objective of this research was to characterize the discussion forum of a virtual community in which the members addressed drug-related issues for ludic and recreational purposes. Through a netnography approach, a virtual community in Spanish was studied in which users shared content regarding the use of psychoactive substances, mainly cannabis. Data collection was carried out based on 12 forums whose main topic was the report of consumer experiences. The data were compiled in Excel databases, and thematic data analysis was carried out with the support of the Nvivo software. The results showed that the discussions were characterized by dynamics in which users exchange a wide amount of knowledge about drugs, their uses, symptoms and physiological effects, as well as psychological experience. At the same time, the dynamics of the forums provide resources to users to promote the construction of a sense of community. The findings showed the interest of the communities in promoting care environments, risk prevention, and harm reduction. These types of studies corroborate the relevance of forums as potential and useful scenarios for drug research.
Downloads
References
Barbieri, I., Trivelloni, M., Zani, B., & Palacios-Espinosa, X. (2012). Consumo de sustancias psicoactivas en los contextos recreativos entre estudiantes universitarios en Colombia. Revista Ciencias de la Salud, 10 (Especial): 69-86.
Barrat, M.J., Allen, M. & Lenton, S. (2014). “PMA Sounds Fun”: Negotiating Drug Discourses Online. Substance Use & Misuse, 49, 987-998. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2013.852584
Becoña, E. (2000). Los adolescentes y el consumo de drogas. Papeles del Psicólogo, 77, 25-32.
Bilgrei, O.R. (2016). From “herbal highs” to the “heroin of cannabis”: Exploring the evolving discourse on synthetic cannabinoid use in a Norwegian Internet drug forum. International Journal of Drug Policy, 29, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.011
Blanchard, A. L., & Markus, M. L. (2004). The experienced" sense" of a virtual community: characteristics and processes. ACM Sigmis Database: The Database for Advances in Information Systems, 35(1), 64-79. https://doi.org/10.1145/968464.968470
Blankers, M., van der Gouwe, D., & van Laar, M. (2019). 4-Fluoramphetamine in the Netherlands: Text-mining and sentiment analysis of internet forums. International Journal of Drug Policy, 64, 34-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.11.016
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Butler, S., Oyedele, N., Dailey Govoni, T., & Green, L. (2020). How Motivations for Using Buprenorphine Products Differ From Using Opioid Analgesics: Evidence from an Observational Study of Internet Discussions Among Recreational Users. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6(1), e16038. https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.16038
Calafat, A. Fernández, C., Juan, M., & Becoña, E. (2005). Gestión de la vida recreativa: ¿Un factor de riesgo determinante en el uso reciente de drogas? Adicciones, 17(4), 337-347. https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.364
Calderón, C. A. & Pérez-Acosta, A. M. (2018). Farmacovigilancia y automedicación. En: F. Jaramillo Juárez, E. G. Cardona Muñoz y A. R. Rincón Sánchez (compiladores), Farmacología General (capítulo 15, pp. 367-392). Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes y Universidad de Guadalajara.
Chary, M., Park, E.H., McKenzie, A., Sun, J., Manini, A.F., et al. (2014). Signs & Symptoms of Dextromethorphan Exposure from YouTube. PLoS ONE, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082452
Chary, M., Yi, D., & Manini, A.F. (2018) Candyflipping and Other combinations: Identifying Drug–Drug Combinations from an Online Forum. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9(135), 1-9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00135. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00135
Cheon, E., & Ahn, J. (2009). Virtual community 101: Know your virtual community and members. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (pp. 639-643). https://doi.org/10.1145/1516241.1516353
Daniulaityte, R., Carlson, R., Falck, R., Cameron, D., Perera, S., Chen, L., & Sheth, A. (2013). "I just wanted to tell you that loperamide WILL WORK": a web-based study of extra-medical use of loperamide. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 130(1-3), 241-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.11.003
Davey, Z., Schifano, F., Corazza, O., & Deluca, P. (2012). e-Psychonauts: Conducting research in online drug forum communities. Journal of Mental Health, 21(4), 386-394. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2012.682265
Fachner J. (2008). An ethno-methodological approach to cannabis and music perception, with EEG brain mapping in a naturalistic setting. Anthropology of Consciousness, 17, 78–103. https://doi.org/10.1525/ac.2006.17.2.78
Halpern, J.H., & Pope, H.G. (2001). Hallucinogens on the Internet: A Vast New Source of Underground Drug Information. America Journal of Psychiatry, 158(3), 481-483. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.481
Holtz P, Kronberger N, Wagner W. (2012). Analyzing internet forums- a practical guide. Journal of Media Psychology, 24, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000062
Katsuki, T., Mackey, T.K., & Cuomo, R. (2015). Establishing a Link Between Prescription Drug Abuse and Illicit Online Pharmacies: Analysis of Twitter Data. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(12), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5144
Kozinets, R. (2011). The Field Behind the Screen: Using Netnography For Marketing Research in Online Communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935
Kjellgren, A. Henningsson, H., & Soussan, C. (2013). Fascination and Social togetherness—discussions about Spice Smoking on a Swedish Internet Forum. Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment, 7, 191–198. https://doi.org/10.4137/SART.S13323
Kjellgren, A. & Jonsson, K. (2013). Methoxetamine (MXE) – A Phenomenological Study of Experiences Induced by a “Legal High” from the Internet. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 45(3), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2013.803647
Lamy, F.R., Daniulaityte, R., Nahhas, R.W., Barrat, M.J., Smith, A. G., Sheth, A., Martins, S.S., Boyer, E.W. & Carlson, R.G. (2017). Increased in synthetic cannabinoids-related harms: results from a longitudinal web-based content analysis. International Journal of Drug Policy, 44, 121-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.05.007
Loi, B., Zloh, M., De Luca, M.A., Pintori, N., Corkery, J., & Schifano, F. (2017). 4,4'-Dimethylaminorex ("4,4'-DMAR";"Serotini") misuse: A Web-based study. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical & Experimental, 32(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/hup.2575
LeClair, A., Kelly, B.C., Pawson, M., Wells, B.E. & Parsons, J.T. (2015). Motivations for prescription drug misuse among young adults: Considering social and developmental contexts. Drugs Education, Prevention and Policy, 22(3), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.3109/09687637.2015.1030355
Mamonov, S., Koufaris, M., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2016). The Role of the Sense of Community in the Sustainability of Social Network Sites. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20(4), 470 498. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2016.1171974
Morales, G. & Mendoza, M. (2011). La investigación de mercados online y la netnografía. Universidad de Chile. Recuperado de: http://repositorio.uchile.cl/bitstream/handle/2250/108062/ec-morales_v.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Polidura, I. (2015). Netnografía. Investigación, análisis e intervención social online. Barcelona: Editorial UOC. Revista Teknokultura, 12(1), 203-210.
Redondas, J. (2003). Netnografía e identidades. Analista de DiceLaRed, publicado el 24 de septiembre. http://netnografia.blogspot.com/
Ruiz-Sternberg, A. M., & Pérez-Acosta, A. M. (2011). Automedicación y términos relacionados: una reflexión conceptual. Revista de Ciencias de la Salud, 9(1), 83-97.
Turpo, O.W. (2008). La netnografía: un método de investigación e internet. Educar, 4, 81-93.
Sinneberg, L., Buttenheim, A.M., Padrez, K., Mancheno, C., Ungar, L. & Merchant, R.M. (2017). Twitter as a Tool for Health Research: A Systematic Review. AJPH Research, 107(1), e1-e8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303512
Schifano, F., Deluca, P., Baldacchino, A., Peltoniemi, T., Scherbaum, N., Torrens, M., Farre, M., Flores, I., Rossi, M., Eastwood, D., Guionnet, C., Rawafk, S., Agosti, L., Di Furia, L., Brigada, R., Majava, A., Siemann, H., Leoni, M., Tomasin, A., Rovetto, F., & Ghodse, A. H. (2005). Drugs on the web; the Psychonaut 2002 EU Project. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 30(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2005.11.035
Soussan, C., & Kjellgren, A. (2014). Harm reduction and knowledge exchange-a qualitative analysis of drug related Internet discussion forums. Harm Reduction Journal, 11, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-11-25.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Health and Addictions Journal/Revista Salud y Drogas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal agree to the journal's statement of ethical principles and to the following terms:
The rights of the published material shall belong to their respective authors. Articles published in HAAJ may be used under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license, and may be read, copied, distributed, printed, searched, or linked to in the full text of this journal without prior permission from the publisher or author, provided that HAAJ and the authors are acknowledged and not used for commercial purposes.
Authors may include the work in institutional repositories or other publications as long as this journal is acknowledged and properly cited.
The HAAJ editorial team encourages authors to disseminate their published work through any means (conferences, classes, lectures, talks, etc.) and/or platforms (social networks, repositories, websites, etc.).
HAAJ follows the Core Practices of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics).