ENHANCING ALCOHOL USE SELF-REPORT: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE ALCOHOL USE DISORDERS IDENTIFICATION TEST

Authors

  • Paula Victoria Gimenez Institute of Basic, Applied Psychology and Technology (IPSIBAT), National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), National University of Mar del Plata (UNMdP), Mar del Plata, Argentina. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3090-5228
  • Tomás Salomón Institute of Basic, Applied Psychology and Technology (IPSIBAT), National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), National University of Mar del Plata (UNMdP), Mar del Plata, Argentina.
  • Raquel Inés Peltzer Institute of Basic, Applied Psychology and Technology (IPSIBAT), National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), National University of Mar del Plata (UNMdP), Mar del Plata, Argentina.
  • Mariana Cremonte
  • Karina Conde Institute of Basic, Applied Psychology and Technology (IPSIBAT), National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), National University of Mar del Plata (UNMdP), Mar del Plata, Argentina.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21134/1067

Keywords:

Alcohol self-report, harmful drinking, screening, Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, alcohol related-problems.

Abstract

Objective: We examined whether rearranging the order of items and response options in the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) could improve its psychometric properties. Method: We conducted a 2x2 factorial experiment with an Argentinian general population sample (n=1128; M=37.29 years, SD=11.93; 75.9% cis-women). We randomly assigned participants to one of four AUDIT versions, varying the order of item presentation (alcohol consumption first vs. alcohol-related problems first) and response options ("never" to "daily/almost daily" vs. reverse order). Results: Versions presenting alcohol-related problems first showed higher reliability. The version with alcohol-related problems first and response options in reverse order had the highest internal consistency (?=.88). Endorsement for alcohol-related problems was also higher in these versions, regardless of response option order. The versions presenting items about alcohol-related problems first also showed better item performance, regardless of the response options' order. Conclusions: the order of response options seems irrelevant, but presenting items about alcohol-related problems first appears to enhance the AUDIT's performance. This change could facilitate the adequate identification of people needing assistance from health services, which future studies should further explore.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adong, J., Fatch, R., Emenyonu, N. I., Cheng, D. M., Muyindike, W. R., Ngabirano, C., ... & Hahn, J. A. (2019). Social desirability bias impacts self?reported alcohol use among persons with HIV in Uganda. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 43(12), 2591-2598. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.14218

Ay, A., Çam, C., Kilinc, A., Fatih Önsüz, M., & Metinta?, S. (2025). Prevalence of hazardous alcohol consumption and evaluation of associated factors in university students. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 60(1), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-024-02680-8

Babor, T. F., & Higgins-Biddle, J. C. (2001). Brief Intervention. For Hazardous and Harmful Drinking. A Manual for Use in Primary Care. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/67210

Babor, T. F., Higgins-Biddle, J. C., Saunders, J. B., & Monteiro, M. G. (2001). The alcohol use disorders identification test. World Health Organization. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/67205/W?sequence=1

Bendtsen, M., Garnett, C., Toner, P., & Shorter, G. W. (2023). The effect of question order on outcomes in the core outcome set for brief alcohol interventions among online help-seekers. Addiction Science and Clinical Practice, 18(Suppl 1), O5.

Bischof, G., Reinhardt, S., Grothues, J., Dybek, I., Meyer, C., Hapke, U., ... & Rumpf, H. J. (2005). Effects of item sequence on the performance of the AUDIT in general practices. Drug and Alcohol dependence, 79(3), 373-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.03.002

Bradley, K. A., DeBenedetti, A. F., Volk, R. J., Williams, E. C., Frank, D., & Kivlahan, D. R. (2007). AUDIT?C as a brief screen for alcohol misuse in primary care. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 31(7), 1208-1217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00403.x

Chyung, S. Y., Kennedy, M., & Campbell, I. (2018). Evidence?based survey design: The use of ascending or descending order of Likert?type response options. Performance Improvement, 57(9), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21800

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological assessment, 31(12), 1412. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000626

Conde, K., & Cremonte, M. (2015). Calidad de los datos de encuestas sobre consumo de alcohol en estudiantes universitarios. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 31, 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00061114

Conde, K., Gimenez, P. V., & Cremonte, M. (2018). Características de los instrumentos de tamizaje del trastorno por uso de alcohol en jóvenes universitarios de Argentina. Clínica y Salud, 29(1), 27-33. https://dx.doi.org/10.5093/clysa2018a5

Costa, A. R. L., & Hauck Filho, N. (2019). Methods for the control of extreme response styles in self-report instruments: A review. Trends in Psychology, 27(2), 309-323. https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2019.2-02

Cremonte, M., Ledesma, R. D., Cherpitel, C. J., & Borges, G. (2010). Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in the emergency department in Argentina, Mexico and the United States. Addictive Behaviors, 35(9), 818- 825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.03.021

Davis, C. G., Thake, J., & Vilhena, N. (2010). Social desirability biases in self-reported alcohol consumption and harms. Addictive behaviors, 35(4), 302-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.11.001

Esser, M. B., Sherk, A., Subbaraman, M. S., Martinez, P., Karriker-Jaffe, K. J., Sacks, J. J., & Naimi, T. S. (2022). Improving estimates of alcohol-attributable deaths in the United States: impact of adjusting for the underreporting of alcohol consumption. Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 83(1), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2022.83.134

Garbarski, D., Schaeffer, N. C., & Dykema, J. (2015). The effects of response option order and question order on self-rated health. Quality of Life Research, 24, 1443-1453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0861-y

Harford, T. C. (1994). The effects of order of questions on reported alcohol consumption. Addiction, 89(4), 421-4.

Hays, R. D., Bell, R. M., Damush, T., Hill, L., Dimatteo, M. R., & Marshall, G. N. (1994). Do response options influence self-reports of alcohol use? International journal of the addictions, 29(14), 1909-1920. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10826089409128263

Higgins-Biddle, J. C., & Babor, T. F. (2018). A review of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), AUDIT-C, and USAUDIT for screening in the United States: Past issues and future directions. The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 44(6), 578-586. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2018.1456545

Ivis, F. J., Adlaf, E. M., & Rehm, J. (2000). Incorporating the AUDIT into a general population telephone survey: a methodological experiment. Drug Alcohol Depend, 60, 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-8716(00)80012-5

Kypri, K., Wilson, A., Attia, J., Sheeran, P., Miller, P., & McCambridge, J. (2016). Social desirability bias in the reporting of alcohol consumption: a randomized trial. Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 77(3), 526-531. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2016.77.526

Lange, S., Shield, K., Monteiro, M., & Rehm, J. (2019). Facilitating screening and brief interventions in primary care: A systematic review and meta?analysis of the AUDIT as an indicator of alcohol use disorders. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 43(10), 2028-2037. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.14171

Latkin, C. A., Edwards, C., Davey-Rothwell, M. A., & Tobin, K. E. (2017). The relationship between social desirability bias and self-reports of health, substance use, and social network factors among urban substance users in Baltimore, Maryland. Addictive behaviors, 73, 133-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.005

Neufeld, M., Bunova, A., Fadeeva, E., Nadezhdin, A., Tetenova, E., Vyshinsky, K., ... & Rehm, J. (2023). Translating and adapting the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) for use in the Russian Federation: A multicentre pilot study to inform validation procedures. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 40(5), 536-553. https://doi.org/10.1177/14550725231183236

Ohtani, Y., Ueno, F., Kimura, M., Matsushita, S., Mimura, M., & Uchida, H. (2023). Highly endorsed screening and assessment scales for alcohol problems: A systematic review. Neuropsychopharmacology Reports, 43(4), 470-481. https://doi.org/10.1002/npr2.12363

Pereira, F. A., de Oliveira, L. G., da Silva, G. T., Scatena, A., Kim, H. S., & Andrade, A. L. M. (2025). Validation of alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) in Brazilian colleges: Network analysis, measurement invariance and screening efficiency. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 23(4), 2907-2925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-024-01268-2

Savic, M., Room, R., Mugavin, J., Pennay, A., & Livingston, M. (2016). Defining "drinking culture": A critical review of its meaning and connotation in social research on alcohol problems. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 23(4), 270- 282. https://doi.org/10.3109/09687637.2016.1153602

Selin, K. H. (2006). Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT): what does it screen? Performance of the AUDIT against four different criteria in a Swedish population sample. Substance use & misuse, 41(14), 1881-1899. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080601025532

Schøler, P. N., Andersen, M. B., Andersen, K., Becker, U., Thiele, M., & Nielsen, A. S. (2025). Validation of the alcohol use disorders identification test in a Danish hospital setting. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 20(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-025-00638-w

Steinweg, D. L., & Worth, H. (1993). Alcoholism: the keys to the CAGE. The American journal of medicine, 94(5), 520-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(93)90088-7

Toner, P., Böhnke, J. R., Andersen, P., & McCambridge, J. (2019). Alcohol screening and assessment measures for young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis of validation studies. Drug and alcohol dependence, 202, 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.01.030

Thurstone, L. L. (1931). Relation between reliability and validity of a test. En L. L. Thurstone The reliability and validity of tests: Derivation and interpretation of fundamental formulae concerned with reliability and validity of tests and illustrative problems (pp. 50–51). Edwards Brothers. https://doi.org/10.1037/11418-014

Vergés, A. (2022). On the desirability of social desirability measures in substance use research. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 83(4), 582-587. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2022.83.582

Wardell, J. D., Cunningham, J. A., Quilty, L. C., Carter, S., & Hendershot, C. S. (2020). Can the AUDIT consumption items distinguish lower severity from high severity patients seeking treatment for alcohol use disorder? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 114, 108001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108001

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

Issue

Section

Papers

How to Cite

ENHANCING ALCOHOL USE SELF-REPORT: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE ALCOHOL USE DISORDERS IDENTIFICATION TEST. (2026). Health and Addictions Journal Revista Salud Y Drogas, 26(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.21134/1067

Similar Articles

11-20 of 282

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.