Disadvantageous decision-making profiles in substance dependents / Patrón de toma de decisiones. Desventajosas en pacientes drogodependientes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21134/haaj.v6i1.105Keywords:
Drogodependencias, Toma de Decisiones, Eficacia del Programa Terapéutico. / Keywords, Substance Dependencies, Decision making, Effectiveness of the Therapeutic Program.Abstract
En este trabajo se exponen los resultados de una investigación cuyos objetivos consistieron en: determinar el patrón de Toma de Decisiones de pacientes drogodependientes, correlacionar los perfi les correspondientes a pacientes que se encuentran transitando la Fase de Admisión y los que se hallan en la Fase de Reinserción social de un Tratamiento de Rehabilitación, y obtener el índice de efi cacia del Programa Terapéutico al cual asisten ambos grupos. Se trata de un estudio de corte transversal en donde 20 sujetos conformaron la muestra. Se describe la Hipótesis del Marcador Somático, que es el marco teórico que fundamenta la pertinencia del instrumento de medición del proceso de toma de Decisiones utilizado en este estudio. Los resultados indican la presencia de un patrón de elecciones: desventajosas en los pacientes de la fase de admisión y ventajosas en pacientes de la fase de reinserción social, señalando un elevado índice de efi cacia del tratamiento de asistencia multimodal.
Â
Abstract
In this article the results of an investigation in which the objectives consisted of: determining the decision-making profi les of substance dependents, correlating the profi les corresponding to patients who are going through the Phase of Admission and of those that are in the Phase of social Reintegration of a Treatment of Rehabilitation, and obtaining the index of effectiveness of the Therapeutic Program which both groups attended are shown. This is a cross section study in which 20 subjects conformed the sample. The Somatic Marker Hypothesis is described, in that it is the theoretical frame that bases the validity of the measuring instrument of the decision making process used in this study. The results indicate the presence of a pattern of elections: disadvantageous to patients of the admission phase and advantageous to patients of the social reintegration phase, indicating a high index of effectiveness of the treatment of multimode attendance.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Health and Addictions Journal/Revista Salud y Drogas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal agree to the journal's statement of ethical principles and to the following terms:
The rights of the published material shall belong to their respective authors. Articles published in HAAJ may be used under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license, and may be read, copied, distributed, printed, searched, or linked to in the full text of this journal without prior permission from the publisher or author, provided that HAAJ and the authors are acknowledged and not used for commercial purposes.
Authors may include the work in institutional repositories or other publications as long as this journal is acknowledged and properly cited.
The HAAJ editorial team encourages authors to disseminate their published work through any means (conferences, classes, lectures, talks, etc.) and/or platforms (social networks, repositories, websites, etc.).
HAAJ follows the Core Practices of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics).
How to Cite
